Upon current knowledge, that some of these alternatives, perhaps taken together, would have succeeded? Did anti-Soviet motives influence the U.S.
invasion? Why were many of the possible alternatives not pursued? Does it seem likely, based Americans and other visitors to the exhibit have a right to know, and to worry about, certain crucial matters: Why were the A-bombs used? Why did some scientists oppose their use on Japan? Why were cities and noncombatants chosen as targets, and not simply military targets? Were there plausible ways, without the use of the A-bomb, of ending the Pacific war before November, thereby obviating the U.S.
